How did a repeat offender get a security guard license?
There is a question this story refuses to leave alone, and we deserve an answer to it. A 40-year-old man identified only as Lloyd was arrested for the April 14 ambush in Pavia that killed Goldilocks plant manager Divine, 32, and wounded human resource officer Shane, 28. According to Iloilo Police Provincial Office chief Col.

By Staff Writer
There is a question this story refuses to leave alone, and we deserve an answer to it.
A 40-year-old man identified only as Lloyd was arrested for the April 14 ambush in Pavia that killed Goldilocks plant manager Divine, 32, and wounded human resource officer Shane, 28.
According to Iloilo Police Provincial Office chief Col. Bayani Razalan, the motive was as small as it was lethal: Lloyd had been caught sleeping on the job once or twice while monitoring CCTV cameras at the Earth Grain Inc. plant. Shane recommended his termination. The agency told him April 14 was his last day. Hours later, two women were on the road to a mall in Barangay Ungka when a motorcycle pulled up beside them and someone opened fire.
That is the surface story as the deeper story is that the man arrested for it should never have been wearing a uniform in the first place.
Court records and police reports show Lloyd was arrested on Jan. 25, 2021, in a search warrant operation that yielded a homemade caliber .45 pistol — a violation of Republic Act 10591, the Comprehensive Firearms and Ammunition Regulation Act. He entered a plea bargain and remains on probation. Three years later, on Jan. 6, 2024, he was again found with a caliber .45 pistol after a vehicular incident in Barangay Guinobatan, Leganes, at 3:45 a.m. That second case is still on trial.
Yet somewhere between those two firearms cases, Lloyd was issued a license to exercise the security profession (LESP). Under Republic Act 11917, the law strengthening the regulation of the private security services industry, and the standing rules of the Supervisory Office for Security and Investigation Agencies (SOSIA), an applicant must submit, among others, an NBI clearance, a PNP Directorate for Intelligence (DI) clearance, a court clearance, and a barangay clearance. He must be of good moral character. He must have no record of conviction for crimes involving moral turpitude. The chief of the Regional Civil Security Unit (RCSU) — the field arm of SOSIA — is supposed to be the gatekeeper.
So how did the gate open?
There are only two plausible explanations, and both are damning.
The first is that Lloyd’s clearances were forged. This is not impossible, but it is hard. Forging an NBI clearance, a court clearance, and a PNP-DI clearance convincingly enough to pass an LESP application requires either a reckless gambler or someone with an inside man. A probationer with two firearms cases on his record does not typically have the resources to fool a national licensing system. Unless, of course, he had a contact in the PNP willing to clean the paperwork on the way up.
The second explanation is the one the security industry has whispered about for years: the “package deal.” Pay the right person in the concerned chain, and the application moves. No clearances actually verified. No background actually checked. The fee is steeper than the official rate, but the paperwork comes back stamped. This is not a fringe theory anymore as it has become an open secret in private security circles. It has surfaced periodically in PNP internal cleansing campaigns without ever quite being resolved.
Either way — forgery enabled by an insider, or institutionalized racket — the failure point is the same: the licensing system. And the consequence of that failure was, in this case, not abstract. It was Divine, dead at 9:32 p.m. on April 14 at a Pavia hospital. It was Shane, recovering in a hospital bed because she did her job and recommended the termination of an underperforming employee. It was three children whose father is now in jail and whose mother is working abroad.
THE BIGGER PICTURE
The private security industry in the Philippines is no small employer. It is one of the largest single occupations in the country, with hundreds of thousands of licensed guards, and it has expanded rapidly with the growth of malls, manufacturing, gated subdivisions, and corporate facilities like the Goldilocks plant in Pavia. Every one of those guards is, by design, armed or has access to firearms. The clearance process exists for a reason. It is the only meaningful filter between civilian life and the lawful, daily, close-range presence of armed men in workplaces and public spaces.
When that filter is compromised — whether by forgery, bribery, or a “package deal” culture inside the regulator — the cost is borne by people who never knew the system existed. A plant manager. A human resource officer. The widow of a guard’s victim, somewhere in the country, in some other case the public never hears about.
Two questions need answers:
First, who issued Lloyd’s LESP, when, and based on what clearances? The application file is on record at SOSIA and RCSU-6. It can be pulled and audited. If the clearances were forged, the forgeries can be traced. If they were real but issued despite his pending RA 10591 case, the personnel who approved them have explaining to do.
Second, when was Lloyd’s PNP-DI and court clearance last refreshed? An LESP is valid for five years. If he was first licensed before 2021, his case may have slipped through on a renewal where no fresh check was done. If he was licensed after 2021, someone signed off on a probationer with a pending firearms case.
Iloilo has a right to know which of these it is. The two women on that road in Pavia had a right to know it before Lloyd ever clocked in.
Article Information
Comments (0)
LEAVE A REPLY
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!
Related Articles

Twenty-five years, and we are still here
By Francis Allan L. Angelo I walked into this office in August 2002 looking for a job to tide me over before I went back to school. Lemuel Fernandez and Limuel Celebria interviewed me that morning and asked the kind of questions you do not expect from a regional newsroom — political leanings, ideological orientation,


