Defensor Sr., ex-mayor told to respond to graft raps
THE Office of the Ombudsman (Visayas) has directed former Iloilo Governor Arthur Defensor Sr. and former Lemery Mayor Ligaya Apura to file counter-affidavits to the criminal and administrative charges filed by investigative freelance journalist Manuel “Boy” Mejorada for the alleged illegal use of public funds for the repair and rehabilitation of barangay roads in the municipality of Lemery this year.
In a two-page order, Deputy Ombudsman Paul Elmer Clemente gave Defensor and Apura, who is now the vice mayor of Lemery, a period of ten days to submit their counter –affidavits and controverting evidence to Mejorada’s allegations that the former Governor illegally transferred P1,480,015 in February this year.
Mejorada said he was served a copy of the Ombudsman order yesterday by the warrant service officer of the Pavia police station.
The Ombudsman has docketed the cases as OMB-V-C-19-0158 and OMB-V-A-19-0191. For the criminal case, Defensor and Apura are charged for illegal use of public funds or property, violation of Section 3 (e) of RA 3019, and falsification of public officer, employee or Notary or Ecclesiastic Minister. Administratively, Defensor and Apura are accused of conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service, grave misconduct and serious dishonesty.
In his complaint, Mejorada said Defensor illegally transferred funds from the maintenance and other operating expenses (MOOE) account of the Provincial Engineer’s Office for the “gravelling, re-gravelling and rehabilitation of barangay roads” for five barangays in the municipality.
Based on the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed by and between Defensor and Apura, the funds were intended for the repair and rehabilitation of barangay roads in Layogbato (P280,347.00), San Diego (P265,684.00), Capiñahan (P256,128.00), Dapdapan (P478,584.00) and Marapal (P199,272.00), or a total of P1,480,015.
Mejorada said Defensor committed technical malversation when he drew the funds from the MOOE of the Provincial Engineer’s Office under Supplemental Budget No. 3 of the Province for 2018.
Worse, Defensor and Apura falsified the MOA in making it appear that they were authorized to enter into an agreement when the Sangguniang Bayan resolution they attached to the same was approved only on December 27, 2018.
The MOA itself was signed on December 20, 2018, or one week before the authority was adopted by the SB of Lemery, Iloilo.
Mejorada claimed that the funds were intended as election campaign funds given out by Defensor to his political allies.
“Aside from the fact that the transfer of funds was illegal, I have evidence that the gravelling, re-gravelling and rehabilitation work for the barangay roads were done by truck teams of the PEO,” Mejorada said.
“The barangays never got to spend any funds for the repair and rehabilitation work because everything was done for them by the PEO, for free,” he added.
Comments (0)
LEAVE A REPLY
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!
Related Articles

‘REVENGE OF THE CLOCK’: Sandiganbayan dismisses Mabilog graft case over Ombudsman delay
ILOILO CITY — The Sandiganbayan has dismissed the graft case against former Iloilo City Mayor Jed Patrick E. Mabilog due to delays in the proceedings. Mabilog, who served as city mayor from 2010 to 2017, was appointed undersecretary for public safety of the Department of the Interior and Local Government

AI data center pitch in Oton ends in insults, walkout
OTON, Iloilo — A public consultation on a proposed artificial intelligence (AI) data center here broke down on Friday, Aug. 14, after the Norwegian proponent walked out of the venue and then hurled insults and legal threats at journalists covering the event. Daniel Stefan Robertsen presented

COA studying fraud audit on OVP, DepEd confidential funds
By Francis Allan L. Angelo An auditor from the Commission on Audit told the Impeachment Court that the agency is studying the possibility of launching a fraud audit against the Office of the Vice President and the Department of Education over the “unusual” names of recipients of confidential funds from the two agencies, both of
