Which vaccine is acceptable? – 2

By Modesto P. Sa-onoy

A December 3 report says that a coronavirus vaccine has been cleared for use in England. This is the Pfizer vaccine but after it was administered reports came out that the patient showed an allergy. Supporters of this vaccine did not consider the reaction as adverse, only “normal”. If made available in the Philippines, would you take it?

The Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine is produced in Belgium and its approval does not extend to US citizens. In fact, some say that the vaccine will not pass the US standard.

There are several apparent problems with the vaccines being fast-tracked by the US HHS’ Operation Warp Speed, LifeSitesNews reported.

First among the vaccines’ major problems: they were tested using aborted fetal cells. The production and testing of vaccines that use the remains of aborted children, regardless of when they were killed and at what point they were used in the process, is morally unacceptable and must be consistently opposed by the whole pro-life movement and anybody that believe in the sacredness of human life that was snatched from the unborn and parts of it sold for laboratory and commercial purposes.

Although Pfizer and Moderna claim their vaccines “were not designed or produced using aborted fetal cells, the Personhood Alliance recently reported that the vaccines’ testing phases used the HEK293 aborted fetal cell line to create humanized mice.”

This stomach-churning practice “transferred immortalized cells from a child killed in 1973 into mouse embryos, so that when the mice were born, they had tiny human lungs that researchers infected with COVID to test the vaccines. This type of Frankenscience has no place in a civilized society, certainly not one whose citizens are forced to fund it!” The US WRAP is funded by public funds to hasten the research for the vaccine.

On the other hand world-renowned German epidemiologist, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, “recently submitted a petition to the European Medicines Agency requesting that all #Covid19 vaccine distribution and trials be halted until serious safety concerns are addressed, including the ability to alter human fertility.”

I received information claiming that among the objectives of the vaccine is to restrict human fertility – that when a woman is vaccinated she loses her capability to bear a child and then another vaccine can be made available, under controlled conditions, for her to have a child.

No wonder the Responsible Parenthood mob in the US is working with the vaccine manufacturer to hasten its production. As I wrote some months back, the Gates Foundation and the World Health Organization are into population control programs. And as we discussed before on the background of WHO top man, Tedros Ghebreyesus, he is heavily engaged in population control against his tribal enemy in his native Ethiopia.

My source in the US also reported that “This past week, vaccine safety advocates put up informative banners across major highways throughout all 50 states and in 3 countries.”

The source chatted with organizers Joshua Coleman and Olivia Mikos who formed “V” for Vaccine and used the biggest traffic day of the year to their advantage to draw attention to #Covid19 vaccine safety. US mainstream media did not report this growing opposition to the vaccines whose content is not fully revealed to the public.

Will we also simply accept what is made available by the government?

The Philippine government has, fortunately already recognized these concerns about the vaccine now being peddled in the market. But the government concentrates on the safety and not the moral and ethical issues as to the source and component cells of these vaccines.

The Philippines appears more inclined to use Sinovac with its security concerns.

So far, our religious leaders have not given guidance except a few heroic voices among them. Perhaps it is too early and the facts are not fully revealed. In the US the movement has begun and growing that major mainstream media cooperating with the new order have organized to “correct misinformation” especially what they labeled as “conspiracy theory.”

Anyway, the final decision is ours even if vaccination is made mandatory or a requirement for certain life’s activities, like travel and seeking or availing government and public services.

Several government officials, however, have denied these “rumors” which is fine with us.

But as always, “Caveat emptor!”