When bullies meet consequences
By Herman M. Lagon
I have to admit it: there is something satisfying about watching a fictional bully finally meet his match. You spend several episodes watching weaker students get pushed around, humiliated, threatened, and treated as if nobody can touch their tormentor. Then somebody finally does. The swagger disappears. The smirk is gone. For once, the bully is the one who looks afraid.
If you have been watching the Korean series Teach You a Lesson on Netflix, you probably know the feeling. Ayan. Nakahanap ka rin ng katapat. I enjoyed those moments more than I probably should have. In fact, I hope there is another season.
Then the teacher in me started asking annoying questions. What exactly are we teaching?
The series imagines schools where bullying, violence, difficult parents, corruption, and weakened authority have become so serious that ordinary disciplinary systems can no longer cope. Enter a special government unit willing to do what regular schools supposedly cannot. Its methods are extreme, sometimes disturbingly so. Of course, that is part of the thrill. Nobody watches a revenge drama hoping for three hours of case conferences and properly accomplished incident reports.
But that is also where we have to separate entertainment from education. The series comes out of a particular Korean debate over discipline and teacher authority, while the webtoon on which it is based has drawn serious criticism, including for its treatment of corporal punishment and other controversial themes. We can enjoy watching fictional bullies get their comeuppance without wishing our schools worked that way.
Still, I understand why the fantasy connects with people.
Imagine a parent whose daughter suddenly complains of a stomachache every morning. At first, you think she simply does not want to go to school. Then her grades start dropping. She eats less. She no longer wants to join activities. Her phone is always face down. Eventually, you discover the class group chat: cruel jokes, edited photos, laughing emojis, perhaps even a dummy account created just to make fun of her.
You report it. There is a meeting. Everyone talks. Somebody apologizes. A week later, another post appears. Then you hear: “We are monitoring the situation.” That may be exactly what the school is supposed to do. But when you are the parent watching your child become afraid of Monday morning, “monitoring” can feel painfully close to waiting.
And this is hardly a small problem in the Philippines. PISA 2022 found that 43 percent of Filipino girls and 53 percent of boys reported being bullied at least a few times a month, compared with around 20 and 21 percent across OECD countries. Philippine researchers working with EDCOM II have argued that bullying cannot be solved simply by putting the bully and victim in one room and telling them to behave. The classroom, peer group, family, school culture, and adults around them all matter.
The problem has also followed children home.
Years ago, a nasty remark in the corridor might have ended when the bell rang. Today, somebody records it. Somebody screenshots it. Somebody turns the photo into a meme. Four classmates react with laughing emojis. Another forwards it. By dinner, students from another section know about it. The child may have left the school grounds hours ago, but the humiliation is sitting beside him at the dinner table, glowing from a phone screen.
This is where Teach You a Lesson becomes more interesting to me. Its fantasy is simple: when someone abuses power, send someone more powerful. And goodness, does that feel satisfying when the stronger person is on the side we think is right.
But suppose the only lesson the bully learns is this: Do not hurt weaker people because someday somebody stronger might hurt you. Have we actually changed anything? The bully used fear because he had power. Now somebody else uses greater power to frighten him. Fear simply changes sides.
That does not mean schools should become afraid of imposing consequences. Quite the opposite. A student who repeatedly threatens, hits, humiliates, extorts, or cyberbullies another child cannot simply be told, “Please do not do it again.” The victim needs protection now, not after the fourth conference. Serious cases need investigation, documentation, parental involvement, appropriate sanctions, follow-through, and referral when necessary. Our Anti-Bullying Act already requires schools to put systems like these in place.
But consequences should lead somewhere.
Punishment asks, “What should this child suffer for what he did?” Discipline asks, “How do we stop this behavior?” Education has to ask something harder: “What must this child learn so he does not do it again?”
Sometimes the answer includes sanctions. It may also require counseling, family involvement, behavioral intervention, restitution, monitoring, or a combination of these. Understanding why a child bullies does not erase responsibility. Some children discover that cruelty gets laughs. Some imitate what they see at home or online. Some have been humiliated elsewhere and learn the terrible trick of making somebody smaller so they can briefly feel bigger.
Whatever the reason, the harm remains harm.
There is another danger, though: making resilience the victim’s homework. Ignore them. Block them. Be strong. Change seats. Stay away.
Sometimes those steps are necessary for immediate safety. But notice who keeps adjusting. The bullied child leaves the group chat. The bullied child avoids the canteen. The bullied child changes routes. The bullied child deletes an account. Sometimes the bullied child even transfers schools.
Then we praise the child for being “resilient.” Resilience is valuable. But it should never become a polite way of telling a child to become better at surviving something adults should be trying harder to stop.
We also tend to forget another character in every bullying story: the audience. One student posts the embarrassing photo. Four react with emojis. Three forward it. Somebody records the confrontation instead of helping. Another quietly thinks, Grabe naman, but says nothing because becoming the next target is scary.
Not everyone carries the same responsibility. But cruelty loves an audience. A bully can start it. A crowd can turn it into a culture.
That is why bullying is never just about two children. Classmates matter. Teachers matter. Parents matter. School leaders matter. Even the student who refuses to laugh at the cruel joke matters.
And yes, the bully matters too — not more than the victim, but enough that we should care about what that child becomes next.
We can say, “What you did was wrong. There will be consequences,” and still ask, “What is happening to you?” Those two sentences can live together. In fact, perhaps they should. Otherwise, we may succeed only in frightening a bully into becoming more careful about getting caught.
Parents have an equally difficult job. Of course, we should defend our children when they are falsely accused or treated unfairly. Schools make mistakes. Teachers make mistakes. Children deserve due process. But loving our children cannot mean automatically rescuing them from every consequence.
Sometimes love has to sound like this: “I am on your side because you are my child. But if you hurt somebody, we are going to face what you did.”
Teachers need a similar balance. Restoring authority cannot mean bringing back humiliation, corporal punishment, or fear. But protecting children should not require teachers to become powerless either. A classroom cannot be safe if everyone has rights but nobody can meaningfully enforce responsibilities.
That, for me, is the uncomfortable truth behind Teach You a Lesson. The series gives us something real life rarely does: obvious villains, swift consequences, satisfying takedowns, and an episode that eventually ends.
Schools do not get closing credits. The victim and the bully may both return Monday morning. Their parents may meet outside the gate. Their classmates will still be in the same group chat. The teacher still has a lesson to teach at 8:00. And somehow, after all the hurt, anger, paperwork, conferences, and tears, the school has to become a community again.
So yes, I will probably watch another season. And yes, when that fictional bully’s smirk disappears, a small part of me will probably still whisper, “Ayan, buti nga sa kanya.”
But the better lesson is not that every bully will eventually meet somebody stronger.
It is that strength never gave anyone permission to make someone weaker afraid.
***
Doc H fondly describes himself as a ”student of and for life” who, like many others, aspires to a life-giving and why-driven world grounded in social justice and the pursuit of happiness. His views do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions he is employed or connected with.
Comments (0)
LEAVE A REPLY
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!
Related Articles

Patience since 2024
ON SEPT. 5, Energy Secretary Sharon Garin said the rotational brownouts in the Visayas could end in early October. On Sept. 14, in Iloilo City, she said it would likely last into 2027. Nine days. That is how long the forecast held. We do not doubt that Sec. Garin is working. The grid was thin

Wanted: National Artist
We have ten new National Artists. When Malacañang announced their names last week, the news stirred newfound appreciation for our arts, and to some degree, disappointment and furor over missed possibilities. Discussions were rife on the merits of the recipients, their canon of work and perhaps, inadequacies — or for

UPV Chancellor: beyond the cards
Green. Blue. Red. Orange. For a few hours on Sept. 14, choosing the next UP Visayas chancellor looked deceptively simple. Green meant in favor. Blue meant in favor with reservations. Red meant against. Orange meant against with reservations. Dr. Clement Camposano and Dr. Joefe Santarita raised their positions, one issue after
