When Black quietly delivers gold

By Herman M. Lagon

The images that stay with us in Philippine basketball are usually loud – arms raised, crowds shaking arenas, emotions spilling over. This time, gold arrived without theatrics. In Bangkok, it came through subtraction: fewer stars, fewer assurances, fewer breaks. What remained was a group that trusted one another, anchored by a coach who has learned that steady hands matter more than raised voices.

When Gilas Pilipinas faced host Thailand, the journey had already taken several unexpected turns. Eligibility rules shifted. Player pools shrank. Familiar names disappeared one by one. For many fans, it felt like a slow bleed, the kind that drains optimism before the opening tip. The absence of marquee players could have been fatal. Instead, it forced a reckoning. What does Philippine basketball look like when it cannot lean on its usual pillars? The answer, unexpectedly, was still gold.

This was not a team assembled to intimidate on paper. It was a group built on availability and trust: PBA role players, free agents, collegians, and professionals fresh from overseas stints, many of them carrying more questions than hype. Preparation time was brutally short. Chemistry had to be earned in real time. First halves were often uneasy, even uncomfortable. The whistle did not always cooperate. The crowd certainly did not. Yet the team never unraveled. That composure did not come from talent alone. It came from the bench.

Norman Black has never coached loudly. His authority has always rested on clarity, not volume. In Bangkok, that steadiness mattered more than any play call. While eligibility rules were revised and revised again, he stopped explaining himself publicly, not out of spite, but out of prudence. Information, he sensed, was being weaponized. So he focused inward. Adjustments were made quietly. Roles were simplified. Defense became the anchor. By the second half of games, a pattern emerged: Gilas looked calmer, sharper, more connected. That is rarely accidental.

The gold medal game against Thailand last Friday captured this ethos perfectly. Down at halftime, absorbing pressure from the host nation and its crowd, the Philippines did not panic. Jamie Malonzo attacked the glass with purpose. Robert Bolick steadied the offense. Matthew Wright spaced the floor. Small, disciplined decisions accumulated. A decisive run followed. When Thailand threatened late, the response was not bravado but execution. Free throws were made. Defensive rotations held. The noise receded. The scoreboard did not lie.

What made this run resonate was not dominance but dignity. There were no public tantrums about officiating, no excuses about preparation, no entitlement attached to the jersey. In a region where basketball politics can sometimes overshadow basketball itself, the Philippine Team chose restraint. That choice mattered. Sports psychologists have long noted that teams under perceived injustice often perform better when leadership emphasizes control over reaction, a principle echoed in high-performance studies on composure and decision-making under stress (Fletcher & Sarkar, 2012; Gucciardi et al., 2015). Bangkok offered a live demonstration.

It is tempting to frame this victory as redemption, but that word implies something broken. Philippine basketball was not broken. It was tested. The much-discussed struggles in 3×3, for instance, remind us that success is never uniform across formats. Systems matter. Preparation matters. So do resources and continuity. Yet the 5×5 gold reaffirmed something older and more durable: depth exists. Coaching still matters. And adaptability remains a competitive advantage.

For fellow Filipinos watching from home salas, sports restos, personal devices, or barangay gyms, the parallels were not hard to miss. Many work daily with limited resources, shifting rules, and expectations that change midstream. The lesson from Bangkok was not about heroics. It was about doing the work with what is available, adjusting without complaint, and keeping the long view intact. That posture, quiet but firm, is familiar to anyone who has stayed in the profession long enough.

Norman Black has won Grand Slams, collegiate titles, and international medals. Yet this SEA Games run stands apart precisely because it demanded less ego and more judgment. He maximized what he had, trusted players who were ready to be trusted, and refused to let external noise dictate internal discipline. Leadership literature often distinguishes between performative confidence and grounded confidence. Bangkok belonged firmly to the latter (Northouse, 2022).

In the end, this gold medal will not be remembered for who was missing. It will endure because of who stayed. Players who set aside club duties. Coaches who absorbed pressure without deflecting blame. A team that accepted constraints and still found a way forward. In a decade or two, when stories are retold, the details of eligibility rules may blur. What will remain is the image of a group that won not by overpowering circumstances, but by outlasting them.

That is a story worth keeping. Not because it flatters us, but because it reminds us that even when the deck feels uneven, discipline and composure still count. In Bangkok, Philippine basketball did not shout its way to gold. It earned it, possession by possession, adjustment by adjustment, under a coach who never mistook calm for weakness.

For that, the salute to Norman Black feels less like praise and more like acknowledgment. Some victories do not sparkle immediately. They age well.

*** 

Doc H fondly describes himself as a “student of and for life” who, like many others, aspires to a life-giving and why-driven world grounded in social justice and the pursuit of happiness. His views do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions he is employed or connected with.