Those killer, harmful vaccines – 7

By Modesto P. Sa-onoy

We continue from yesterday’s citation of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies report warning of the gloom-and-doom scenario and the prediction that 70% of COVID-19 deaths will be of dual-vaccinated people.

The academic community slammed the study’s “Alice-in-Wonderland logic, ‘following the science’ down a rabbit hole” since “the report states, ‘this is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups,’ and that ‘this is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.'”

Ethicist Niall McCrae elaborated: We already know that for two to three weeks after the injection, elderly and vulnerable people are at increased risk of serious respiratory infection, due to lowering of immunity. That’s why there was a surge in deaths after vaccination rollout, with the evidence that is most stark in countries with the highest vaccination numbers such as Hungary, Israel, Serbia, Gibraltar and the United Arab Emirates.  The report also suggests a longer-term risk to the vaccinated.

In its review of J&J’s submission for Emergency Use Authorization in February, the US FDA initially urged further surveillance of a slight “numerical imbalance” in blood clotting events after receiving the shot. At the time, it was concluded there was “insufficient” data to determine “a causal relationship” with the vaccine and the drug maker resumed the trial. Because of this “insufficiency” the vaccine was given a go signal, with disastrous effect, negligible to most but not to the victims and their families.

The Defender reported April 12, the rollout of J&J’s COVID vaccine has not been smooth. At the beginning of the month, the vaccine maker had to throw out 15 million doses of its vaccine after they were contaminated with AstraZeneca vaccine ingredients at an unapproved manufacturing plant in Baltimore.

The vaccine maker also has been plagued with shutdowns of its vaccine sites prior to the vaccine being paused, multiple reports of COVID breakthrough cases and criticism over its CEO’s $30 million pay package while the company pays out billions for its role in the opioid epidemic.

In Westminster, England, Church Militant of April 15 said that “the most deaths in a third coronavirus wave will consist of people who have received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. British scientists are also warning in a new doomsday report.

According to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, “The resurgence in both hospitalizations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave, respectively.”

Another report from London by LifeSiteNews (April 16) cited official data saying that “COVID-19 injections have been followed by 847 deaths, and over 626,000 adverse effects, including more than 11,000 psychiatric disorders, 771 seizures, and 12 brain injuries.”

Further, “the U.K. government has released its latest weekly update on adverse effects and deaths following the administration of the hastily developed COVID-19 injections. Between December 8 and April 5, there have now been 31.6 million first doses administered, and 5.4 million second doses.

“Despite persistent claims from government ministers and the mainstream media about the safety of the injections, the official data present a somewhat different picture.”

The picture is grim and ominous.

“By April 5, there were 314 deaths following Pfizer’s injection, 521 following AstraZeneca’s, and a further 12 deaths after an injection which was not identified as either of the two, thus making a total of 847 deaths following the injection.

“A total of 626,087 adverse side effects occurred, with 132,528 reported for Pfizer, and 492,105 for AstraZeneca. This total is up nearly 70,000 from the previous week’s report of 556,609 adverse side effects.

“Following Pfizer’s jab, 42 “spontaneous abortions” (miscarriages) occurred, and after AstraZeneca’s injection, 19 spontaneous abortions took place, with two further still births.”

My compilation of reports of deaths and adverse effects on one or two doses of the vaccine runs along the same lines as the several I cited in the previous columns. But our government seems to have set these reports aside, and in fact, not carried by other media. We have to rely on independent media for these results.

The only defense we have is to reject the vaccine, after all, there are alternatives better, safer and cheaper than the vaccine.