Those killer, harmful vaccines – 2

By Modesto P. Sa-onoy

 

A subsequent paragraph of the London report reaffirmed this admission, noting that in the predicted third wave, “most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses.”

The prediction of how “vaccinated” individuals could account for a substantial majority of predicted hospital admission and deaths,” is attained “by blaming these statistics on age, and the probability of 10 percent of people being left without protection against infection after the virus. This is because the vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modeled here at 95 percent in the over 50-year-olds). There are therefore 5 percent of over 50-year-olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95 percent x 10 percent = 9.5 percent of over 50-year-olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death.”

How will this happen? Were we duped that the vaccine is protection and now they tell us it is a gateway to the other side of existence?

The London study makes Yeadon’s assumption very likely. But who and why will this happen that most victims are vaccinated, hospitalized and dead?

The blame is laid on those who had not been injected. This is probably the reason that the UK wanted a vaccine passport to insure that all its citizens are vaccinated. Or is this “conclusion” made to suit or justify the government plan? Get vaccinated so that the unvaccinated will not infect the vaccinated. Is this it?

“However,” the projection admitted it “did not cast any aspersions on the injections themselves” because “this is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.” Make things more confusing.

On the other hand, the report continues. “The reasoning used in this line appears in stark contrast to that used throughout the majority of the last 12 months, when deaths occurring in 28 days after a positive COVID-19 test (which incidentally have been widely decried as completely unreliable), are deemed to be due to the virus. Yet the study decided not to make any correlation between the injections and the predicted deaths.” The usual escape reason.

Sharing the study’s document on Twitter, Joel Smalley of the anti-lockdown research group HART commented: “In their forecast, the key metrics of hospitalizations and deaths are dominated (60%-70%) by those who are fully vaccinated. Yeah, no typo. Because vaccine failure in the most at-risk where uptake is high will be more serious than susceptibility of the lower-risk unvaccinated.”

Smalley continued. “While these paragraphs (32, 55, and 56) seem to suggest that the elderly who have had the injections would account for the majority of hospitalizations and deaths, in paragraph 31, the study differentiated between the causation of potential new infections, and those affected by the third wave.”

The section in question blamed the “resurgence” on “some people (mostly children) being ineligible for vaccination; others choosing not to receive the vaccine; and others being vaccinated but not perfectly protected (including those who have only received one dose, rather than two).”

This study suggests that any wave of the virus can be blamed on those who declined the vaccination. To repeat my view, this reasoning is made to fit the intent for a full-scale vaccination.

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention records that the “increased risk was approximately one additional case of GBS for every 100,000 people who got the swine flu vaccine.” Given that more than 40 million people were having the swine flu jab, “federal health officials decided that the possibility of an association of GBS with the vaccine, however small, necessitated stopping immunization until the issue could be explored.”

So far, there have been 90 instances of GBS reported in the U.K. after COVID-19 injections, meaning that there is one reported case of GBS in every 6,185 reactions.

The Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare neurological disorder in which the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks part of its peripheral nervous system—the network of nerves located outside of the brain and spinal cord.  GBS can affect anyone, at any age but more frequently in adults and older people. Annually an estimated one person in 100,000 is affected.

Continued on April 29.