Promotion by Default

By Herman M. Lagon

In a public high school in Iloilo City, a Grade 9 teacher scanned her class list and sighed. Out of 43 students, eight could not read a full sentence. Some had not returned since September. But come April, nearly all would receive identical report cards: promoted. In a school in Barotac Nuevo, a Grade 6 student showed her card to her mother, who admitted her daughter still struggled to subtract double-digit numbers. “Pero pasado man gihapon [But still, they pass anyway.],” she said. These are not rare cases. They point to a system-wide issue that has quietly become the norm in Philippine education: mass promotion.

DepEd officials continue to deny this, even during the recent call of EDCOM 2 to review its unwritten protocols. They emphasized that automatic promotion is not written into policy. Yet many teachers share a different reality. When schools are judged by pass rates, and when teachers are discouraged from giving failing grades due to paperwork, pressure, or politics, the message is clear. A rule does not need to be written to be enforced—it only needs to be expected, much so structurally.

Teachers who try to hold the line face uphill battles. Failing a student often means extra work—designing remedial lessons, doing parent conferences, documenting every move—without additional support or pay. School heads, anxious over division-level reviews, sometimes urge teachers to “reconsider” giving failing grades. Even when teachers do all the right things—appeal letters, home visits, parent-teacher conferences, worksheets, interventions—they are still asked, “Wala na iban nga paagi? [Is there no other way?]”

Once a student is logged in the Learner Information System (LIS), they are hard to remove. This system rigidity means students who vanish after first quarter still count in official numbers. The simplest solution becomes to pass them. This helps schools avoid audit flags, spares teachers from extra duties, and sustains the illusion of academic progress. But beneath the neat records lie empty gains. Students are moving forward on paper, but not in learning.

Numbers back this up. The World Bank’s 2022 report shows that the Philippines has the highest learning poverty in East Asia—over 90 percent. Nine out of ten 10-year-olds cannot read or comprehend age-appropriate texts. The 2018 PISA results were equally jarring: Filipino students ranked last in reading among 79 nations. These are not just data points. They reflect wasted potential, eroded trust, and a public education system on the edge.

Mass promotion, while convenient for administrators, comes at a cost. Teachers must juggle wildly uneven learning levels in one room. A single class might include students ready for algebra alongside others who need phonics. The burden is crushing. Over time, this imbalance wears down teachers. Many speak of frustration, fatigue, even thoughts of leaving the profession—not just for higher pay abroad, but for a system that respects integrity over image.

Having spent 21 years in basic education, I am no stranger to these dynamics. When I was a teacher and administrator at Ateneo de Iloilo, the policy was firm and transparent: fail, and you are asked to leave. This only came after multiple interventions and genuine efforts in partnership with the parents. And leave they did—but not without insight. Students who were let go left with more than just failing marks; they carried with them the weight of reflection and lessons shaped by their formators. It was tough love, yes—but it honored learning. It made room for dignity. And above all, it told students that their growth mattered more than their promotion, that all actions or inactions carry consequences, and that intellectual fairness—not pity, pressure, or pogi points—must always prevail.

What hurts more is the message it sends students. Effort becomes optional. Deadlines lose meaning. In a high school in Passi City, teachers observed students showing up only during grading week or when told a quiz mattered. As one teen said bluntly, “Bal-an man na nila nga pasado man sila maskin ano ang matabo [They already know they will pass no matter what happens.].” Once students internalize this, reversing the mindset is an uphill climb.

DepEd’s messaging does not help. While DepEd Order No. 45, s. 2002, clearly states students must master literacy by Grade 3 to be promoted, implementation is patchy at best. Some regions cite the policy; others ignore it. One teacher recalled being told of the “No Read, No Move” rule during training, only to hear later, “Consider all factors.” These mixed messages do not guide—they confuse and dishearten.

This issue is not rooted in bad intentions but in broken incentives. As Secretary Sonny Angara noted, when school success is measured by the number of students promoted, outcomes get sidelined. Teachers prioritize numbers over knowledge. Schools chase pass rates instead of competencies. As Professor Maria Arzadon once pointed out, this is how non-readers end up in college. When evaluation loses credibility, credentials lose meaning.

There are, however, seeds of reform. The reintroduction of the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) shows a move toward assessing real skills. DepEd has promised to review its promotion and remediation policies. But declarations are not enough. What is needed is follow-through: clearer guidelines, real resources for intervention, and genuine protection for teachers who dare to grade with honesty.

Vietnam offers perspective. Its low repetition rate—only 0.8 percent in 2018—is not about leniency, but precision. Students are held back when necessary, not to punish, but to prepare. And their international rankings reflect this. It is not about keeping students from advancing. It is about ensuring that when they do, they are ready.

Our teachers are not asking for perfection. They are asking for trust. Trust in their judgment. Support in their classrooms. Clarity in their mandates. They want a system that values learning, not just logistics. That rewards effort, not just enrollment. That gives every child—not just the brightest—a fair shot at success.

DepEd’s real test is not whether mass promotion exists in writing. It is whether the agency is willing to name what that silence has allowed to fester. Until then, many schools will keep moving students forward while leaving their learning behind. This is not a complaint. It is a call for coherence.

And coherence starts with telling the truth.

***

Doc H fondly describes himself as a ”student of and for life” who, like many others, aspires to a life-giving and why-driven world grounded in social justice and the pursuit of happiness. His views do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions he is employed or connected with.