On employability
By Dr. Clement C. Camposano
Universities that gut the Humanities in their pursuit of so-called “employability” are optimizing for a job market that is already on the verge of being transformed. In 2022, IBM pointed out that while technical skills previously had a “shelf life” of 15 years, this has been cut down to five years with very niche technical skills becoming outdated in as little as 2.5 years.
Many companies have understood this trend, and this is the reason why corporate training budgets have been growing. The obvious implication is that employers are assuming an increasingly bigger role in developing and upskilling their workforces. They need to stay on top and have learned to accept that universities and other institutions of higher learning, even in the developed world, cannot keep abreast with the way industries and workplaces are being disrupted by technology.
The oft-repeated argument that the Humanities are a luxury we cannot afford because employers prefer job-ready technical graduates is seriously flawed. Employers are already spending their own money to build technical skills in-house, after hiring people they believe are highly trainable and have the capacity to navigate the increasingly complex workplace. So much resources are being invested in the upskilling to AI and cloud technology, but not in teaching people how to write effectively, argue a position, think historically, recognize ethical dilemmas, or explore different perspectives. It is assumed that people to be hired have these capabilities already, and can continue building on them largely on their own.
A person with the right academic background can be trained to use the programming language Python in a bootcamp, if the organization sees the need for it. But what about the more durable and layered intellectual skills needed to make sense of data, to frame problems, to read complex texts, and to synthesize diverse viewpoints? At higher levels of the organization, you might be able to upskill a software engineer into machine learning, but how do you upskill into wisdom in such things as trade-offs, questions of ethics, managing conflicts, stakeholder engagement, and understanding historical patterns?
These are all capabilities acquired over years of exposure to various forms of knowledge and the great diversity of human experience. The right response to the challenge of employability is therefore not gutting the Humanities curriculum but coming up with better versions of it, one particularly adapted to the constantly evolving world of work.
(The author is the current of Chancellor of the University of the Philippines – Iloilo City and Miagao campuses)
Comments (0)
LEAVE A REPLY
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!
Related Articles

The 6.4% mirage
You cannot eat a gross regional domestic product. Tell a mother in Molo or a sari-sari store owner in Jordan that Western Visayas led the entire country with a 6.4% economic expansion in 2025 — reaching a valuation of PHP 683.44 billion — and watch her stare back at her electric bill. We spent months patting ourselves on the back for

Accept she is human, so we won’t be disappointed
“Either way, never be sorry about things you have no control over. You’ll just give yourself ulcers. Never half-ass anything. Drink plenty of wine.” – Sylvain Neuvel, Only Human AS long as we don’t accept human beings aren’t perfect, we will continue to wallow in disappointments, which come from the gap

Kumustahan muna tayo
“Okay lang, Sir.” I have heard that answer so many times that I have learned not to believe it too quickly. Sometimes, of course, okay lang really means okay. But sometimes it means, “I am tired.” Or “Ang dami lang, Sir.” Or “I do not know how to explain it.” Sometimes
