No need for vaccines?

By Modesto P. Sa-onoy

 

While browsing the internet, I came across a very interesting and significant report by Patrick Delaney in LifeSiteNews of November 23 last year. This is perhaps one of those writings that were “suppressed” while the vaccine was still on its way to authorization. It is a miracle it came out and not too late for us to consider its assessments.

 

The long article reported that “while Pfizer pharmaceutical made headlines announcing the imminent release of their COVID-19 vaccine to much fanfare a former Vice President and Chief Scientist for the company has flatly rejected the need for any vaccines to bring the COVID-19 pandemic to an end.”

 

Delaney cited an article by Dr. Michael Yeadon, who “spent over 30 years leading new [allergy and respiratory] medicines research in some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies,” and retired from Pfizer with “the most senior research position in this field.”

 

Dr. Yeadon said “There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.”

 

But that is exactly what governments are planning – vaccinate everyone, sick or healthy on the belief that the vaccine is either a cure all or an effective protective shield that will immunize everybody. If Dr. Yeadon’s claim is correct, then the wholesale idea of inoculating everybody is a pure commercial transaction, or worse, another step towards global control.

 

A British national, Dr. Yeadon’s comments came “at the end of a comprehensive criticism of the Scientific Advisor Group for Emergencies (SAGE), a government agency of the U.K. tasked with advising the central government in emergencies. SAGE has played a predominant role in determining public lockdown policies in the U.K., including those recently implemented, as a response to the COVID-19 virus.

 

“After pointing out that SAGE lacked essential expertise in the field they are addressing, with ‘no clinical immunologists’ as members, Yeadon highlights two fundamental errors they have made in their presuppositions which cause their overall conclusions to go radically awry leading to the ‘torturing [of] the population for the last seven months or so.”

 

The First Fundamental Error: “Ridiculous” presumption of 100% susceptibility. This error assumes that Top of Form

Bottom of Form

100% of the population was susceptible to the virus and that no pre-existing immunity existed.

 

Yeadon considers this notion as “ridiculous because while SARS-CoV-2 is indeed novel, coronaviruses are not. There’s no such thing as an ‘ancestor-less virus.” Indeed, he points out, there are at least “four, endemic, common-cold inducing coronaviruses … [which] circulate freely in UK and elsewhere.” Those who have been infected by “one or more of these endemic, common-cold producing coronaviruses in the past, have a long-lived and robust [T-cell] immunity, not only to those viruses, but to closely related viruses. SARS-CoV-2 is one such closely-related virus.”

 

Striking once again at the competence of SAGE, Dr. Yeadon states, “To not expect such cross-over is … to demonstrate the lack of the requisite understanding to build a model reliable enough to use.”

 

Further, he states, that “the common PCR test which is used for detecting COVID-19 ‘cases,’ may come out positive when someone is infected with one of these common cold coronaviruses rendering this test that much less reliable. Of course, based on the final results of these tests, many thousands of individuals have been ordered to disrupt their lives and ‘self-quarantine’ for up to 14 days.”

 

I have cited before statements of other experts questioning the use of the common PCR, not only because it lowered the threshold but because anybody with a slight fever is automatically considered “positive”, the reason that many stayed under quarantine only to be declared “recovered” when in truth they never had the COVID-19 virus.

 

Finally, drawing from the scientific data, Dr. Yeadon concludes that due to previous exposure to common-cold coronaviruses, “a significant proportion (30%) of the population went into 2020 armed with T-cells capable of defending them against SARS-CoV-2, even though they had never seen the virus… SAGE was naively wrong to assume ‘everyone was susceptible’.”

 

Let’s proceed tomorrow on the second error.

 

Top of Form

Bottom of Form