Iloilo LGBTQ+ group condemns councilor’s homophobic remarks

By Mariela Angella Oladive

The LGBTQ+ community in Iloilo City condemned Councilor Romel Duron for making homophobic remarks during a City Council session on Sept. 18, amid a debate over tricycle franchise approvals.

Duron reportedly directed the term “inagi” at fellow Councilor Sedfrey Cabaluna.

In Hiligaynon, “agi” and its derivative “inagi” are derogatory terms used to describe effeminate men or members of the LGBTQ+ community, particularly those perceived as gay.

The term implies a lack of masculinity and is considered offensive when used in a mocking context.

Duron’s comments, “Inagi naman na ang imo ya” (“That’s being effeminate again”) and “Abi indi ta mag-inagi” (“Let’s not act effeminate”), were seen as belittling and dismissive, reinforcing harmful stereotypes.

The remarks were perceived as an attempt to demean Cabaluna’s behavior or stance.

In response, the LGBTQ+ community expressed outrage. In a statement, the group emphasized the harmful impact of such language: “All human beings should be accorded dignity and respect irrespective of their sexual orientation or gender identity.”

They called on public officials and the community to foster inclusivity and reject discriminatory rhetoric.

The statement also highlighted Iloilo City’s reputation as the “City of Love” and called for an atmosphere of acceptance and safety for all citizens.

To promote this message, the group launched the hashtag #SalloIloBatunKita (“In Iloilo, everyone is accepted”).

In a media interview the following day, Councilor Duron defended his remarks, saying they were merely expressions and not intended to offend.

“If you were offended, I am truly sorry. I did not intend to offend you… I always welcome and serve everyone who comes to me regardless of sex and affiliation,” Duron said.

However, this incident is not the first time Duron has faced backlash for using the term “inagi.”

He has made similar remarks in past council sessions, which has caused tension. Despite his apology, the recurrence of such comments has reignited discussions about the need for respectful and inclusive public discourse.