IBP raises alarm on arrest of journalists covering the protest actions
The Integrated Bar of the Philippines takes notice of the alarming arrest of journalists covering the protest actions of farmers and artists. In a recent press briefing, PNP Officer-in-Charge Lt. Gen. Danao Jr. accused the members of the press of agitating the activist groups during the protest, asking: “what is [their] purpose”? They were then

By Staff Writer
The Integrated Bar of the Philippines takes notice of the alarming arrest of journalists covering the protest actions of farmers and artists.
In a recent press briefing, PNP Officer-in-Charge Lt. Gen. Danao Jr. accused the members of the press of agitating the activist groups during the protest, asking: “what is [their] purpose”? They were then swiftly charged with malicious mischief and illegal assembly alongside the persons they were covering.
Journalists and other members of the press enjoy a wide latitude of discretion in investigating and reporting news relating to public affairs. Any intrusion into this liberty of speech and of the press risks depriving the public of crucial knowledge of government affairs. Indeed, without these rights, “no vigilant press would flourish. And without a vigilant press, the government’s mistakes would go unnoticed, their abuses unexposed, and their wrongdoings uncorrected.” (Tulfo v. People, G.R. No. 187113, January 11, 2021).
A heavy-handed approach to the charge of illegal assembly guts the freedom to peaceably assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.
As well, the practice of affiliating journalists by virtue of their mere presence at events of public interest is questionable. Journalists should not have to run the risk of arrest and criminal charges when they are discharging the constitutionally-protected duties of covering and reporting on matters of public consequence, such as land reform disputes.
Zeal in law enforcement is always welcome. But it must be equal. If any leniency is to be dispensed then, let it be for the poor and the downtrodden, not to entitled individuals with a documented history for reckless imprudence. Lately, we see more compassion for the latter, rather than the former.
Respect for constitutional rights is illusory if they do not apply to all. And strict adherence to due process should be the norm, not dependent on affluence or political leanings.
Article Information
Comments (0)
LEAVE A REPLY
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!
Related Articles

BRIDGING THE GENDERED GAP
It is easy to cheer for progress—especially when numbers say we are doing well. The country has often ranked high in gender equality lists, topping Southeast Asia at times. We have had women in politics, laws like the Magna Carta for Women, and a visible female presence in public life. But

Family Law cases
Family matters are almost always difficult to litigate. For lawyers practicing Family Law, it is hard to be lawyer and counselor at the same time as this area of practice is often too emotionally-charged. Three cases handed down in 2025 prove this point. Case no. 1 involves what this
