Do vaccines have whiff of evil?

By Modesto P. Sa-onoy

 

Dr. Michael Yeadon whose article I cited here earlier as reported by LifeSiteNews continues with his criticism of the Pfizer vaccine that he consider unnecessary. Indeed many medical practitioners believe and had proven that non-vaccine treatment are effective and had been tested and cheaper as well. The problem is that governments, for reasons unknown, is glued or obsessed with the vaccine.

While a government, media and corporate campaign prepares to inoculate 300 million Americans by spring of 2021, the voice of Michael Yeadon, along with those of thousands of other medical scientists and practitioners remain suppressed and unheeded. There is no more openness or dialogue – those in power simply shut them down refusing to consider the alternatives and their views, experience and expertise of their colleagues in the medical profession.

We need not go far to find confirmation of Yeadon’s lamentation. Just ask your doctor who is probably afraid his license would be revoked for advocating treatment not sanctioned by the government despite the government’s inability to provide the medicine to save lives.

“Any such proposals” of universal inoculation, Yeadon writes, “are not only completely unnecessary but if done using any kind of coercion at all, illegal. I would completely understand and would consider accepting early use of a vaccine only if done with fully informed consent and, even then, only if offered to the most vulnerable in our community. Other proposals have, to me, the whiff of evil about them and I will oppose them as vigorously as I have followed the pandemic so far.”

On his part, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., nephew of former U.S. president John F. Kennedy, environmental attorney, author, and founder of Children’s Health Defense, has been raising awareness about vaccines injuring children for decades. In addition to the organization’s firm opposition to the government moves, Kennedy has singled out Pfizer as one of several vaccine producers with a record of incurring criminal penalties for their products.

In a July debate, Kennedy emphasized that Pfizer, and three other leading developers of coronavirus vaccines, Glaxo, Sanofi, Merck, are “convicted serial felon[s].” Remember Sanofi and Dengvaxia?

“In the past 10 years, just in the last decade, those companies have paid 35 billion dollars in criminal penalties, damages, fines, for lying to doctors, for defrauding science, for falsifying science, for killing hundreds of thousands of Americans knowingly,” Kennedy said.

He added, “It requires a cognitive dissonance for people who understand the criminal corporate cultures of these four companies to believe that they’re doing this in every other product that they have, but they’re not doing it with vaccines.

“Following the announcement of Pfizer’s ‘90% effective’ coronavirus vaccine, with the anticipation of imminent release, the firm’s stock price rose 15% from $36.40 to $41.94 per share, at which point the company’s CEO and Chairman, Albert Bourla, sold 61.8% of his shares in the company for almost $5.6 million. The Independent reports that in response to inquiries Pfizer replied that this transaction was an ‘automated process, set up earlier this year’ where ‘shares are sold provided they go above a pre-agreed price’.”

One commentator said that this is all about money. Indeed, one issue that arose in the Philippine government plan to buy the vaccine is the price. There are now several vaccines in the market – Pfizer, Moderna, Altra Zeneca, Sinovac and Sputnik, to name the most prominent.

At issue in the Philippines is not which vaccine the government would buy but the price and the government said that it cannot divulge the price it will pay because of the “non-disclosure clause.”

This is puzzling because the prices are out there in the internet, at one time I cited these prices. The issue is that our laws require that prices paid by the government should be transparent.

More puzzling is why would the vaccine manufacturers refuse revealing the price? Are they now encouraging graft? This is coercion against our government and people. The manufacturers are actually forcing the governments for financial gain and they want it in secret. They, with the connivance of WHO that had already succeeded in convincing governments to suppress alternative treatment and now they are bullying the government.

Is this not evil?