Are the vaccines for real? – 5

By Modesto P. Sa-onoy

 

Regarding the use of PCR for determining whether a person is infected, Dr. David Martin said he interviewed Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Andy Kaufman who confirmed his assessment of the PCR and that the person who developed the PCR said it is not to be used to diagnose of anything. Philippine officials rely mainly on PCR for their diagnoses and their victims did not know better but only followed orders.

Martin said, “The only reason we are using PCR tests is that governors are maintaining a state of emergency. If that state of emergency is lifted in any state or in the country, the PCR test won’t be allowed to be used. We’re maintaining a state of emergency so that manufacturers can keep selling a thing that would never be approved if it was subject to a clinical trial. It goes for what’s being called vaccines too. The gene therapy that Moderna and Pfizer are doing, both of those would be suspended immediately if the state of emergency got lifted. If you lift the state of emergency, the whole house of cards falls.”

Without the state of emergency all the authoritarian rules are illegal, which includes prohibiting hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin or other protocols that can effectively and cheaply treat Covid-19.

He continued, “There’s no question. If you look historically, for many years, Dr. Anthony Fauci at NIAID has held his annual advisory committee meeting. Every year he laments the fact that they’re trying to build this universal influenza vaccine, which he refers to using as an infant in-print vaccine. They’ve been trying to do this for years and it hasn’t worked. This happens to be an opportunity for Anthony Fauci to get what he has not been able to get through legal means. He wants to get to a place where he forces a vaccine on a population. He’s manipulating this situation to force a vaccine on a population. He forgot that if he’s going to force a vaccine on a population, it should at least be a vaccine.”

I had written about that before but Dr. Martin elaborated saying the motive has “always been financial. There are billions of dollars at stake and NIAID is essentially the incubator for the pharmaceutical industry. He’s serving the paymasters that have let him manage US$191-billion in his career at NIAID.”

The interviewer reacted to Dr. Martin’s exposition. “There are lots to consider here. Lots of food for thought from Dr. Martin. But let’s say I’m an individual that was reading all these facts has been persuaded. I do not want to get this gene therapy technology. I don’t want even to get the Astra Zeneca vaccine. I don’t want to get any of this but I’m under pressure either because of my job or for travel purposes to do so, what would you advise me to do?”

Indeed, Filipinos ask the same. Supposed we don’t want to get this gene therapy disguised as a vaccine, but compelled by government, what can we do?

He said that is not his role to “advise a person at all. This is a decision that any human being is going to ultimately have to make based on whether or not they choose to live or they choose to be enslaved. This is like any point in history where you have to make decisions that are based on what is moral and ethical and right with respect to your own sense of responsibility and accountability. The fact of the matter is like wearing a seat belt, like doing a whole bunch of other things, your choice to engage in an activity is ultimately going to be a decision that you have to live with.

“I will not allow my body to be invaded with a thing that is been developed in an unethical and illegal way or to let anybody have the opportunity to manipulate my genetic code. If that means that it comes at a cost or whatever else, my life happens to be worth more than that. We’ve been conditioned to fall into this trap.

“I’m not going to let my well-being be enslaved to a commercial interest trying to extort or blackmail me.”

Should we?