Are the vaccines for real? – 2

By Modesto P. Sa-onoy

 

I have a close friend who was forced to stay in the hotel at his expense because the barangay chief and the Bacolod City Health Office insisted he had the virus but the city did not show him any proof. After 14 days in hotel quarantine, he was discharged. That was last November. Until now the CHO has not shown him any result despite several follow-ups. Well, his sad experience cost him P30,000. The gangster in the city wanted to get a copy of his hotel receipt. He refused suspecting the gangsters would get the refund from PhilHealth.

To continue from yesterday, the interviewer asked Dr. Martin to clarify further. She said, “I know some individuals who said they were like feeling sick and got a negative test but my sister-in-law, who was feeling great, got a positive test.”

“It will always be the case.” Dr. Martin replied. “The causal link that the media, the CDC made and the COVID tracker, which is the collaboration between the Bloomberg Foundation, the Gates Foundation, Zuckerberg Foundation and others, the official numbers that we get trapped across the screens every morning of our computers in our televisions – those numbers are wilfully lying. They have been wilfully lying since the inception of this. There is not a causal link between these things that have never been established. It has never even been close to be established. We have a situation where the illusion of the problem is that people say, ‘I don’t want to get COVID-19.’ What they mean is they don’t want to get infected with a virus. The problem is those two things are not related to each other.”

Isn’t this our experience? Every morning till we get down to sleep, the data of infection, recoveries and deaths glare at us on television or reported ad nauseam by radio.

Dr. Martin lambasted this process that in an earlier article I said is intended to keep up the fear and bludgeon the population to submission.

He said, “A viral infection hasn’t been documented in the majority of what is called cases. There is no basis for that conflation other than the manipulation of the public. That’s the first half of the problem. The second half of the problem is that what is being touted as a vaccination, which as you well know when somebody says the word vaccination, the public understanding is that you are being treated with an attenuated or alive virus or a fragment of an attenuated and that the treatment is meant to keep you from getting an infection and it is meant to keep you from transmitting the infection that vaccine in the common definition of a vaccine is meant to do.”

He cited the case of Moderna and Pfizer which he said is not a vaccine but gene therapy.

“It’s a chemotherapy agent that is gene therapy. It is not a vaccine. What is this doing? It’s sending a strand of synthetic RNA into the human being and is invoking within the human being, the creation of the S1 spike protein, which is a pathogen. It’s a toxin inside of human beings. This is not only not keeping you from getting sick, it’s making your body produce the thing that makes you sick.

“It is not a vaccine because a vaccine is supposed to trigger immunity. It’s not supposed to trigger you to make a toxin.”

Is this why the government says even if vaccinated we can still get Covid-19? So, how do they differ?

“It’s not somewhat different,” Martin explained. “It’s not the same at all, but a public manipulation of misrepresentation of clinical treatment. It’s not a vaccination. It’s not a prohibiting transmission device. It’s a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body somehow gets used to dealing with. But unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune response, this is to trigger for the creation of the toxin.”

I cited several times the manufacturers saying their vaccine teaches our body to fight this virus, the vaccine is a virus killer and had been tested.

We’ll continue February 4 with Martin debunking the pharmaceutical claims of testing.